THE GARIBALDI RANKING MODE METRIC (GR2M) MODEL AS A METHOD FOR ASSESSING ACCURATE AND FAIR WORK TEAMS

Authors

  • Ganjar Garibaldi STIE Ekuitas, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32770/jbfem.vol267-76

Keywords:

Performance Appraisal; Ranking Method; Performance.

Abstract

Garibaldi Ranking Mode Metric (GR2M) Model, is a work team performance appraisal method that aims to provide information of team performance obtained from the assessment of perceptions of all team members, which aims to provide accurate data on the performance of each team member performance. In this method GR2M assessment, each member is required to provide an assessment with a comprehensive ranking and modus method for all team members, including himself. Furthermore, by compiling and averaging all the assessment results of all team members, an assessment will be obtained that represents all assessors' perceptions in this case, all team members. Dimensions used for this are; 1) Work process and 2) Work results. While each dimension consists of several indicators. From testing on the main sectors of business that are growing rapidly, namely Information and telecommunications in Indonesia that are quite representative and the world of education, obtained fair and accurate assessment results representing the perceptions of the team members. Qualitative research method with triangulation validation. With this method it is proven that the factors tested are significant factors in explaining and measuring the potential of the correlation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguinis, H. (2014). Performance management. 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Al-Rasyid, H.K. (2005). Social statistics. Bandung: Postgraduate Program Padjajaran University (translated from Indonesian: Statistika sosial. Bandung: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Padjajaran).

Bernardin, H.J., dan Russell, J.E.A. (2013). Human resource management: an experential approach. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Dessler, G. (2015). Human resource management. 14th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Balkin, D.B., & Cardy, R.L. (2012). Managing human resources,7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Kuncoro, M. (2013), Research methods for business & economics, 4th ed. Jakarta: Erlangga (translated from Indonesian: Metode riset untuk bisnis & ekonomi. 4th ed. Jakarta: Erlangga)

Mondy, R.W., dan Martocchio, J.J. (2016). Human Resource Management. ed.14. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P.M. (2015). Human resource management: gaining a competitive advantage. 9th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

Sugiyono. (2010). Understanding qualitative research. Bandung: Alfabeta. (translated from Indonesian: Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta).

Sugiyono. (2014). Qualitative quantitative research methods and R&D. 14th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta. (translated from Indonesian: Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. 14th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta).

Akinbowale, M. A., Jinabhai, D. C., & Lourens, M. E. (2013). The impact of performance appraisal policy on employee performance–A case study of Guaranty Trust Bank in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 677-686.

Iqbal, N., Ahmad, N., Haider, Z., Batool, Y., & Qurat-ul-ain. (2013). Impact of performance appraisal on employee’s performance involving the moderating role of motivation. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(1), 38-56.

Published

2019-03-24

How to Cite

Garibaldi, G. (2019). THE GARIBALDI RANKING MODE METRIC (GR2M) MODEL AS A METHOD FOR ASSESSING ACCURATE AND FAIR WORK TEAMS. JBFEM, 2(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.32770/jbfem.vol267-76